Evaluation of physical topologies of WSN networks for measuring environmental variables

Authors

  • S. Saigua Carvajal Escuela de Ingeniería en Electrónica, Telecomunicaciones y Redes, Facultad de Informática y Electrónica, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH)
  • M. Villafuerte Haro Escuela de Ingeniería en Electrónica, Telecomunicaciones y Redes, Facultad de Informática y Electrónica, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH)
  • D. Ávila Pesantez Escuela de Ingeniería en Electrónica, Telecomunicaciones y Redes, Facultad de Informática y Electrónica, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH)
  • A. Arellano Escuela de Ingeniería en Electrónica, Telecomunicaciones y Redes, Facultad de Informática y Electrónica, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26423/rctu.v3i1.84

Keywords:

Wireless Sensor Network, Packet Delivery Ratio, Digital sensor, WSN topologies

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study between physical topologies that support WSN in order to determine the most efficient applied to a wireless network of environmental sensors. The research was performed by the support of Network Simulator 2 (NS-2), it allows to create an environment similar to real and simulated its operation, to determine the best topology an inductive method was applied to evaluate the data from NS-2 that were based on the performance metrics such as: sending packages, energy consumption and coverage. As a result it was obtained that the star physical topology is the best to implement a WSN network for environmental measurements, that has Packet Delivery Ratio of 97,9 %, Throughput of 0,7542 Kbps, a delay of 0,0162 ms, a low energy consumption and a greater sensor coverage area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-28

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Evaluation of physical topologies of WSN networks for measuring environmental variables. (2015). UPSE Scientific and Technological Magazine, 3(1), 159-165. https://doi.org/10.26423/rctu.v3i1.84