Reading to learn: understanding reading within integrated vocabulary instructionin a1 efl learners

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26423/rcpi.v6i1.209

Keywords:

reading, vocabulary instruction, reading comprehension, perceptions

Abstract

This experimental quantitative study explored the effects of an integrated vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension performance of A1 EFL learners in a rural public school in Ecuador. The participants of this study were students between 15 and 17 years old in their first baccalaureate year, all of them were selected by convenience sampling. The participants were divided into two groups (traditional and integrated) and asked to participate in eight reading lessons with their designated vocabulary instruction. After each class, they took part in a reading comprehension test based on literal comprehension questions. Moreover, the perceptions from the experimental group were gathered by a questionnaire. Additionally, a vocabulary knowledge scale (VKS) was used three times to measure previous knowledge, learning, and retention of words. This study shows that an integrated vocabulary instruction improves learners´ reading comprehension, and it is beneficial for vocabulary learning and retention. Furthermore, this research work proposes a further study on the benefits of an integrated instruction by working with upper levels of proficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Z., Mukundan, J., Baki, R., & Mohd, A. (2012). Second Language Learners’ Attitudes towards the Methods of Learning Vocabulary. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 24-36. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n4p24

Andrew, K., & Adams, R. (2010). Should Vocabulary Instruction Be Integrated or Isolated? TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 222-249. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.219943

Bachowickz, C., Fisher, P., & Ogle, D. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 524-539. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.4.5

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Golonka, E., Bowles, A., Silbert, N., Kramasz, D., Blake, C., & Buckwalter, T. (2015). The Role of Context and Cognitive Effort in Vocabulary Learning: A Study of Intermediate-Level Learners of Arabic. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 19-39. doi: 10.1111/modl.12191

Gungor, F., &Yayh, D. (2016). The Interplay between Text-based Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension of Turkish EFL Learners. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 1171-1188. doi:10.12738/estp.2016.4.0078

Guthrie, J., & Lutz, S. (2014). Effects of Classroom Practices on Reading Comprehension, Engagement, and Motivations for Adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387-416.doi:10.1002/rrq.81

Hamzehlou, S., Zainal, Z., & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A Review on the Important Role of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension Performance. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555-563. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.300

Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.

Kim, Y. (2011). The Role of Task-Induced Involvement and Learner Proficiency in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition. Language Learning, 61(Suppl.1), 100-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00644.x

Nation, P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge.

Naeimi, M., & Chow, T. (2015). Vocabulary Acquisition through Direct and Indirect Learning Strategies. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 142-151. doi:10.5539/elt.v8n10p142

Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., &Grabe, W. (2011). The Percentage of Words Known in a Text and Reading Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(i), 26-43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x

Yin, Z. (2013). Infer the Meaning of Unknown Words by Sheer Guess or by Clues? An Exploration on the Clue Use in Chinese EFL Learner’s Lexical Inferencing. English Language Teaching, 6(11).

Published

2018-06-20

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Reading to learn: understanding reading within integrated vocabulary instructionin a1 efl learners. (2018). Magazine Science and Innovation Teaching, 6(1), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.26423/rcpi.v6i1.209